top of page

Research ethics approval

Item 30: Plans for seeking research ethics committee/institutional review board approval.

Example

“The protocol, informed consent forms, and all other study material have been approved by the Ottawa Health Science Network - Research Ethics Board (20180452-01H). Each participating hospital’s Research Ethics Board (REB) has also approved the trial protocol. Consent material is available in French and English. … PRICE-2 will be conducted according to Good Clinical Practice and based on the principles of the second version of the Tri-Council Policy Statement ” [345]

Explanation

Before enrolling participants, a universal requirement for the ethical conduct of clinical trials is the review and approval of the protocol by qualified individuals who are not associated with the research team and have no disqualifying conflicts of interest as reviewers [46, 472]. The review is typically conducted by a formal Research Ethics Board/Committee (also called an Institutional Review Board) in accordance with jurisdictional policy.

The protocol should document where approval has been obtained, or outline plans to seek such approval at all sites.

 

Summary of key elements to address

  • Plans to obtain research ethics committee/institutional review board approval

Administrative information

Open Science

Introduction

Methods: Patient and public involvement, trial design

Methods: Participants, interventions, and outcomes

Methods: Assignment of interventions

Methods: Data collection, management, and analysis

Methods: Monitoring

Ethics

Logo: jointly funded by the UKRI Medical Research Council and the NIHR (National Institute for Health and Care Research)
University of Oxford logo
University of Toronto logo
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill logo
University of Southern Denmark (SDU) logo
University of Ottawa (uOttawa) logo
Université Paris Cité (UPC) logo

The 2025 update of SPIRIT and CONSORT, and this website, are funded by the MRC-NIHR: Better Methods, Better Research [MR/W020483/1]. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the MRC, or the Department of Health and Social Care.

bottom of page