top of page

Participant flow, including flow diagram

Item 22b: For each group, losses and exclusions after randomisation, together with reasons

Example

See figure 2.421

 

Explanation

Some protocol deviations may be reported in the flow diagram (item 22a), for example, participants who did not receive the intended intervention. If participants were excluded after randomisation (contrary to the intention-to-treat principle) because they were found not to meet eligibility criteria, they should be included in the flow diagram. Use of the term “protocol deviation” in published articles is not sufficient to justify exclusion of participants after randomisation. The nature of the protocol deviation and the exact reason for excluding participants after randomisation should always be reported. Similarly, if participants did not complete the treatment intervention as allocated (ie, discontinued treatment), this should be reported by trial group, with reasons.

 

While attrition as a result of loss to follow-up is often unavoidable, it is important to report the number of participants who do not complete follow-up as planned; this should be reported by trial group along with reasons. For the primary outcome, loss to follow-up can be reported in the flow diagram.

Logo: jointly funded by the UKRI Medical Research Council and the NIHR (National Institute for Health and Care Research)
University of Oxford logo
University of Toronto logo
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill logo
University of Southern Denmark (SDU) logo
University of Ottawa (uOttawa) logo
Université Paris Cité (UPC) logo

The 2025 update of SPIRIT and CONSORT, and this website, are funded by the MRC-NIHR: Better Methods, Better Research [MR/W020483/1]. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the MRC, or the Department of Health and Social Care.

bottom of page